<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Very Strong Statements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/</link>
	<description>amusements for gentlemen and scholars</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:55:27 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Name</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2006</link>
		<dc:creator>Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 01:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2006</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t you just write about the random strange shit that is in your head? That&#039;s a theme. I like the lack of politics. Plus, if you quit blogging my obsession with you may wilt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#39;t you just write about the random strange shit that is in your head? That&#39;s a theme. I like the lack of politics. Plus, if you quit blogging my obsession with you may wilt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Fahrenheit</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2005</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Fahrenheit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2005</guid>
		<description>Just because you&#039;re not physically traveling and having adventures doesn&#039;t mean that you don&#039;t have any to talk about now.  This blog still serves the same function it did when you were wherever the fuck you were.  It&#039;s a nice place to go to read about what you&#039;re up to.  How many of us get to see you with any frequency?  Maybe we should just change it into a pizza blog.  I ate at California Pizza Kitchen for the first time last week and it sucked.  What was the last pizza you ate?  Are you reading anything for pleasure?  What are you doing you anti-social bastard?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just because you&#39;re not physically traveling and having adventures doesn&#39;t mean that you don&#39;t have any to talk about now.  This blog still serves the same function it did when you were wherever the fuck you were.  It&#39;s a nice place to go to read about what you&#39;re up to.  How many of us get to see you with any frequency?  Maybe we should just change it into a pizza blog.  I ate at California Pizza Kitchen for the first time last week and it sucked.  What was the last pizza you ate?  Are you reading anything for pleasure?  What are you doing you anti-social bastard?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eden</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2004</link>
		<dc:creator>Eden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 16:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2004</guid>
		<description>Ditto Douglas on LSH. Also ditto Nagasaki on being a little weary of discussing politics. Adventures or no, I just like hearing you talk about stuff, and since, as you say, you&#039;re not looking for a wide audience, why worry about adhering strictly to a theme? And if you want to adhere to a theme, why worry if others are using the same theme? Just because, for example, there are many blogs &quot;about writing&quot; doesn&#039;t mean the topic of &quot;writing&quot; is exhausted.  Didn&#039;t one of our wise teachers (Cory?) say if you write about what you enjoy, it doesn&#039;t matter how thematically relevant it is?  Maybe I said that. In any case, I&#039;m saying it now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PS - if you don&#039;t get Pam&#039;s posthumous papers, I want &#039;em.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto Douglas on LSH. Also ditto Nagasaki on being a little weary of discussing politics. Adventures or no, I just like hearing you talk about stuff, and since, as you say, you&#39;re not looking for a wide audience, why worry about adhering strictly to a theme? And if you want to adhere to a theme, why worry if others are using the same theme? Just because, for example, there are many blogs &#8220;about writing&#8221; doesn&#39;t mean the topic of &#8220;writing&#8221; is exhausted.  Didn&#39;t one of our wise teachers (Cory?) say if you write about what you enjoy, it doesn&#39;t matter how thematically relevant it is?  Maybe I said that. In any case, I&#39;m saying it now.</p>
<p>PS &#8211; if you don&#39;t get Pam&#39;s posthumous papers, I want &#39;em.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Lucas</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2003</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Lucas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2003</guid>
		<description>Obama Peace Prize: Good.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;LSH: Quit worrying and post neat stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama Peace Prize: Good.</p>
<p>LSH: Quit worrying and post neat stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamela</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2002</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 15:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2002</guid>
		<description>I just got off the phone with my lawyer. I had a provision added to my will that states: &quot;SH is not to be allowed access and control over my posthumous papers until he makes a public vow to stop reading, talking about or finding anything remotely worthwhile about PT.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got off the phone with my lawyer. I had a provision added to my will that states: &#8220;SH is not to be allowed access and control over my posthumous papers until he makes a public vow to stop reading, talking about or finding anything remotely worthwhile about PT.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nagasaki</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2001</link>
		<dc:creator>Nagasaki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2001</guid>
		<description>The Peace Prize isn&#039;t something I bother to think about often, and as such, I really don&#039;t care about this.  So what?  The Scandiwegians like Obama, as do much of the world.  Does the award really mean anything?  The right will launch an assault focused on the left-leaning European fascination with Obama and, I&#039;m sure, questioning the the validity of the award.  And to some, it will seem justified since Obama hasn&#039;t had time to really DO anything other than make us feel a touch better perhaps about our future.  Oh, and perhaps work the the FED in keeping the entire world financial system from collapsing.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As for LSH, I don&#039;t know if its age or time, I just don&#039;t often have the desire to discuss politics at length anymore.  Maybe its depression, who knows.  I admit, I enjoyed this site more when it was full of updates of your wanderings.  Your life was so different from mine it was interesting to read about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Peace Prize isn&#39;t something I bother to think about often, and as such, I really don&#39;t care about this.  So what?  The Scandiwegians like Obama, as do much of the world.  Does the award really mean anything?  The right will launch an assault focused on the left-leaning European fascination with Obama and, I&#39;m sure, questioning the the validity of the award.  And to some, it will seem justified since Obama hasn&#39;t had time to really DO anything other than make us feel a touch better perhaps about our future.  Oh, and perhaps work the the FED in keeping the entire world financial system from collapsing.  </p>
<p>As for LSH, I don&#39;t know if its age or time, I just don&#39;t often have the desire to discuss politics at length anymore.  Maybe its depression, who knows.  I admit, I enjoyed this site more when it was full of updates of your wanderings.  Your life was so different from mine it was interesting to read about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: houlios</title>
		<link>http://www.longstraighthighway.com/2009/10/09/very-strong-statements/comment-page-1/#comment-2000</link>
		<dc:creator>houlios</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 12:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longstraighthighway.com/?p=1395#comment-2000</guid>
		<description>Re: the Nobel Prize&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Most of the people reading this blog know that my hat-of-Obama-love knows no limit, but even I wouldn&#039;t have given it to him at this point.  But I think Shane is on the money when he points out that this shows how low regard for America and the office of the POTUS had fallen around the world based on the Dubya presidency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the &quot;I wish I had written it&quot; department, Josh Marshall @ &lt;a href=&quot;http://talkingpointsmemo.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;talkingpointsmemo.com&lt;/a&gt; writes:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;This is an odd award. You&#039;d expect it to come later in Obama&#039;s presidency and tied to some particular event or accomplishment. But the unmistakable message of the award is one of the consequences of a period in which the most powerful country in the world, the &#039;hyper-power&#039; as the French have it, became the focus of destabilization and in real if limited ways lawlessness. A harsh judgment, yes. But a dark period. And Obama has begun, if fitfully and very imperfectly to many of his supporters, to steer the ship of state in a different direction. If that seems like a meager accomplishment to many of the usual Washington types it&#039;s a profound reflection of their own enablement of the Bush era and how compromised they are by it, how much they perpetuated the belief that it was &#039;normal history&#039; rather than dark aberration.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: the Nobel Prize</p>
<p>Most of the people reading this blog know that my hat-of-Obama-love knows no limit, but even I wouldn&#39;t have given it to him at this point.  But I think Shane is on the money when he points out that this shows how low regard for America and the office of the POTUS had fallen around the world based on the Dubya presidency.</p>
<p>In the &#8220;I wish I had written it&#8221; department, Josh Marshall @ <a href="http://talkingpointsmemo.com" rel="nofollow">talkingpointsmemo.com</a> writes:</p>
<p>&#8220;This is an odd award. You&#39;d expect it to come later in Obama&#39;s presidency and tied to some particular event or accomplishment. But the unmistakable message of the award is one of the consequences of a period in which the most powerful country in the world, the &#39;hyper-power&#39; as the French have it, became the focus of destabilization and in real if limited ways lawlessness. A harsh judgment, yes. But a dark period. And Obama has begun, if fitfully and very imperfectly to many of his supporters, to steer the ship of state in a different direction. If that seems like a meager accomplishment to many of the usual Washington types it&#39;s a profound reflection of their own enablement of the Bush era and how compromised they are by it, how much they perpetuated the belief that it was &#39;normal history&#39; rather than dark aberration.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
