Skip to content

Very Strong Statements

First, and unrelatedly, Obama won the Nobel Peace Prize. This makes me feel weird. Thorbjoern Jagland, one of the Nobel Committe and possessor of a very fine name, said: “Only very rarely has a person to the same extent as Obama captured the world’s attention and given its people hope for a better future,” which is nice and laudable and all, but honestly. Something more substantive would be nice.

Of course, what this really is is a very strong statement about just how much the rest of the world hated Bush, how completely he buggered the national reputation, and how much everyone wants to believe in the United States again. I knew all of these things already, but this news makes me re-evaluate in the same way as the pictures of those monks in Vietnam who set themselves on fire back in the day: if you believe in something that strongly, whatever it is, then people better bloody well pay attention.

Anyway. That’s neither here nor there.

You know that I hate linking to Penelope Trunk, but honor demands it. Her post on how blogs need themes comes at the right time. This is probably why I hate linking to her, not because she’s solipsistic to the point of dementia, which she is, but because the results of her solipsistic dementia so often approximate my own thoughts. Which is probably a statement as strong, in its way, as that of the Nobel Committee, and one I will think about later when I feel more robust to the conclusions I would inevitably reach.

If you’re reading this you know that posting at LSH has fallen off considerably. We kind of peaked around last year’s election when passions were high and drums were beating. But that peak belies a general trough. A few times I resolved half-assedly that I’d do better, post more, but that was a stupid resolution since it was resolved in advance of really thinking about what I was supposed to be resolving, and why.

The long and short of it is that I’m not sure what to say anymore. The distinctions PT draws in her article are, as usual, stated too absolutely, or else maybe just inapplicable in their extrema for my own situation, which doesn’t match her own. I’m not trying to draw a giant audience. I’m not trying to be about any particular thing, and I have no interest in being the definitive source for discussion about top hats, or whatever.

On the other hand, the lack of focus at LSH serves mostly to keep me from talking about stuff. I don’t talk about writing because other forums exist better positioned for that, and it would be a waste of time to do it here. I could talk about the shit inside my headspace but I see no point in that anymore. If I’m struggling through a depression I don’t feel like making yet another I’m Depressed Again post any more than you want to read another one; and if I’m not struggling through a depression then what am I to say? Life is fiction, and fiction is drama. To ignore this reality is to damn yourself to a blog that resembles the Twitter feed of someone who doesn’t understand what Twitter is for: “Eating lunch.” “Going to work.” “Picking ass.”

Other themes, which are neither drama nor a catalog of minutiae, are possible, but tend to fall into the writing bin – if I want to talk about Big Ideas then a post here is, frankly, wasted. I don’t have the readership to make a conversation out of that, and what readership I have doesn’t care about the implications of audio illusions on cogntive pleasure.

Anyway, you get the idea. I’m not sure what I should be doing. LSH’s best days were when I was traveling, and I could post and keep friends in the loop, and those posts became records of experiences during an important and vital time. Every day I felt that much was at stake, that whatever shit I was dealing with could change the direction of my life, and so talking about it mattered. Those conditions no longer pertain. If life were a basketball game, that wandering period was a series of overtime free throws. Now, well, it’s the second quarter grind in a mid-season game. And maybe that’s a pathological way of looking at life, but that’s what I’ve got.

So I’m trying to think about what to do. If I should do anything; if LSH should change to something else or just go away. If you have an opinion on this you can post it here, or email me.

  • Name
    Can't you just write about the random strange shit that is in your head? That's a theme. I like the lack of politics. Plus, if you quit blogging my obsession with you may wilt.
  • Mr. Fahrenheit
    Just because you're not physically traveling and having adventures doesn't mean that you don't have any to talk about now. This blog still serves the same function it did when you were wherever the fuck you were. It's a nice place to go to read about what you're up to. How many of us get to see you with any frequency? Maybe we should just change it into a pizza blog. I ate at California Pizza Kitchen for the first time last week and it sucked. What was the last pizza you ate? Are you reading anything for pleasure? What are you doing you anti-social bastard?
  • Ditto Douglas on LSH. Also ditto Nagasaki on being a little weary of discussing politics. Adventures or no, I just like hearing you talk about stuff, and since, as you say, you're not looking for a wide audience, why worry about adhering strictly to a theme? And if you want to adhere to a theme, why worry if others are using the same theme? Just because, for example, there are many blogs "about writing" doesn't mean the topic of "writing" is exhausted. Didn't one of our wise teachers (Cory?) say if you write about what you enjoy, it doesn't matter how thematically relevant it is? Maybe I said that. In any case, I'm saying it now.

    PS - if you don't get Pam's posthumous papers, I want 'em.
  • Obama Peace Prize: Good.

    LSH: Quit worrying and post neat stuff.
  • I just got off the phone with my lawyer. I had a provision added to my will that states: "SH is not to be allowed access and control over my posthumous papers until he makes a public vow to stop reading, talking about or finding anything remotely worthwhile about PT."
  • Nagasaki
    The Peace Prize isn't something I bother to think about often, and as such, I really don't care about this. So what? The Scandiwegians like Obama, as do much of the world. Does the award really mean anything? The right will launch an assault focused on the left-leaning European fascination with Obama and, I'm sure, questioning the the validity of the award. And to some, it will seem justified since Obama hasn't had time to really DO anything other than make us feel a touch better perhaps about our future. Oh, and perhaps work the the FED in keeping the entire world financial system from collapsing.

    As for LSH, I don't know if its age or time, I just don't often have the desire to discuss politics at length anymore. Maybe its depression, who knows. I admit, I enjoyed this site more when it was full of updates of your wanderings. Your life was so different from mine it was interesting to read about.
  • houlios
    Re: the Nobel Prize

    Most of the people reading this blog know that my hat-of-Obama-love knows no limit, but even I wouldn't have given it to him at this point. But I think Shane is on the money when he points out that this shows how low regard for America and the office of the POTUS had fallen around the world based on the Dubya presidency.

    In the "I wish I had written it" department, Josh Marshall @ talkingpointsmemo.com writes:

    "This is an odd award. You'd expect it to come later in Obama's presidency and tied to some particular event or accomplishment. But the unmistakable message of the award is one of the consequences of a period in which the most powerful country in the world, the 'hyper-power' as the French have it, became the focus of destabilization and in real if limited ways lawlessness. A harsh judgment, yes. But a dark period. And Obama has begun, if fitfully and very imperfectly to many of his supporters, to steer the ship of state in a different direction. If that seems like a meager accomplishment to many of the usual Washington types it's a profound reflection of their own enablement of the Bush era and how compromised they are by it, how much they perpetuated the belief that it was 'normal history' rather than dark aberration."
blog comments powered by Disqus