Skip to content

Canadian Healthcare

I don’t really know why I bother linking to things like this article describing some of the Canadian healthcare myths. Oh wait, yes I do – because I secretly want somebody who reads this blog to make some idiotic fucking comment about what a bad idea single-payer coverage is so I can smash them with a rhetorical hammer.

In the interests of the fairness for which I am so justly famous, I will admit that if you make a lot of money and have stable employment and will continue to have stable employment until you die, then this is Not Your Problem. Congratulations to you.

Transformers

I hadn’t really decided whether or not to see the new Transformers movie. On the plus side, it’s a spectacle, and I love spectacle. On the minus side, it’s bound to be at about the right dramatic level for someone who’s had a pencil stabbed into his brain, or else anyone who likes Nascar.

But after reading this review, I may be pushed over the edge into seeing it:

And then there’s the “id” part, which is the part where stuff blows up real good, and huge machines smash each other up. And every single performance is so ridiculous that it looks down on “over the top” as if from a great height. It’s the part of your brain that thinks it would be awesome to see robots with giant dangling testicles, or hot chicks turning into robot tentacle monsters, or “ghetto” robots that talk in inept hip-hop slang and smash each other playfully, or funny Jewish men who talk about their “schmear” and randomly strip to their G-strings. Is that going too far? Then let’s go 100 times farther than that and see what happens!

I love it when you hate something so much that your ranting about it turns into a kind of love.

Hat tip kottke.

Invisible treasures

You guys may remember that I respect Tyler Cowen enough to have bought one of his books just to get a personalized answer to a question (about how reading speed affects assimilation) and that he is my answer to the thought experiment: If you could sit next to anybody on an airplane, who would you want it to be? Well, he’s got an article up at Fast Company on personal economies, which is a super lame term to describe the rush of social production that everyone reading this blog engages in every day, though some a lot more than others:

A second part of the human capital dividend comes from our productivity as Web consumers. Billions of people are rapidly becoming more knowledgeable and better connected to one another. Self-education has never been more fun, and that is because we are in control of that process like never before.

The theme of ideological capital obsesses me. From time to time it becomes apparent, even through the assorted fogs that obscure most of the world, how revolutionary are the times in which we live. DDB moved out of the Hot Tamale Club into a place without internet, and he spends shitloads of time pecking into his crappy Blackberry trying to get his fix. The flow of information, the weaving together of a thousand strands of information and insight and tiny amusements is the chief leisure occupation of a hell of a lot of people. But unlike TV-watching, which this new web activity is unseating, your online explorations creates value for other people.

Someday we’ll gain the tools to measure these new benefits. Twitter’s value will lie not in its eventual market cap but in the human connections it creates. My Twitter feed is a virtual meeting room with economists, aid workers, entrepreneurs, housewives, celebrities, and plain old friends. The Web unites millions of diverse individuals, who interact and sometimes even meet up or marry. The world has a lot more of these connections, even if we’ve yet to see all of their implications — including the traditional financial ones of new businesses, employment, and revenue. And it may sound counterintuitive, but the more time you spend staring at your screen, the bigger that human capital dividend will be.

I’m thinking of how affected I am by your tweets, Facebook updates, shared items on Google Reader, Flickr photos, everything FriendFeed aggregates, even what few comments get made on this blog. The web has a lot of rah-rah folks who can do a better job of cheerleading than I can, so I’ll just paint the image I see one more time: a billion people pecking away like a billion tiny factories, creating “durable” goods both more and less durable than anything we’ve known before.

Fat highways

As someone who’s ranted many a time about the non-transportation issues involved in public transportation and urban development, I found this blurb pretty interesting:

But even subtle growth can have a dramatic impact. The environmental activist group Friends of the Earth estimates that just 10 miles of a new four-lane highway create the equivalent lifetime emissions of nearly 47,000 Hummers, and the public health implications are equally alarming. By overfeeding development, highways are fattening up America and Americans at the same time. A Georgia Tech study shows that every hour spent in a car each day increases the likelihood of obesity by 6 percent, while walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods decrease it by 7 percent, lowering the overall relative risk of obesity by 35 percent. The National Institutes of Health links obesity to decreased life expectancy, so more highways mean more sprawl, more fat, and shorter lives. Our roads are literally killing us.

Freeway expansion is intended to relieve congestion, but in fact it encourages more commuting and longer distances, so cities are trapped in a vicious cycle, enabling overdevelopment. The insidious sprawl of my hometown, Houston, was one of the reasons I left; it seemed impossible to do anything without a car, and “pedestrian” was a pejorative term. So imagine my shock when the city began reclaiming its inner-city neighborhoods and installed a light-rail transit system. If Houston can do it, any place can.

Wait – an infrastructure and political climate that encourages people to spread all over hell and spend 15% of their waking hours driving back and forth in a car has _consequences_? Consequences that extend beyond the personal preferences of a single person? What?

From here.

Chill factor: Iran

This is a short video showing a clash between the protestors and the riot police.  If you watch to the end you see the protestors routing the police to cries of “Hurrah!  Hurrah!”

Who mowed my lawn?

Monica and I came home tonight from father’s day at my parents’ and somebody had mowed our lawn. My first thought was jubilation – I fucking despise mowing the lawn: it sets off my allergies like crazy and hurts my wrists and is just generally miserable, and as I’ve avoided mowing the lawn I’ve become more reluctant to mow the lawn and it was getting really tall, some little trees had grown up in the backyard and it got worse and worse and that made me even more immobilized with avoidance behavior. Anyway, so I was delighted. Truly delighted simply at the gift, and then delighted that somebody cared enough to do this just for a surprise.

But then I started to worry that this wasn’t a gift from one of my friends, it was an intervention from one of my neighbors, sending a subtle message that we should mow the fucking lawn. Which we should, granted. But now I’m obsessed, wondering if one of my friends has been astoundingly generous and wonderful, or if somebody thinks we’re super big shitbags. Which coming from these neighbors is a hell of a statement.

So anyway. Could whoever mowed my lawn please let me know? Look, if you want to be anonymous that’s okay, just send me a (private) email from some anonymous account or something. But do let me know because now this is worse than having the lawn be as long as it was.

Yes, I know I am a wreck of a human being. I don’t need to be told again.

Criminal justice system>justice

This is, spectacular, to say the least.

In 1993, William Osburne was convicted of kidnapping, assaulting and raping a woman in Anchorage, Alaska.  He spent the next 14 years of his life behind bars.  Osburne insists that he is innocent, the State of Alaska has in its possession DNA evidence which will once and for all prove his guilt or innocence, and Osburne has offered to pay for DNA testing out of his own pocket.  Allowing Osburne to prove—or disprove–his claim of innocence will cost Alaska literally nothing.

Nevertheless, the Supreme Court held today in a 5-4 decisionby Chief Justice Roberts that Osburne is out of luck.  Although Roberts conceded that “[i]t is now often possible to determine whether a biological tissue matches a suspect with near certainty,” he determined that Osburne has no right to pay for a test that could exonerate him for a crime he did not commit.  Allowing Osburne to prove his potential innocence, Roberts said, risks “unnecessarily overthrowing the established system of criminal justice.”

What the fuck?  The state has possession of the evidence.  The perpetrator will pay for the testing.  But the conservatives on the SCOTUS have a large enough block to prevent the pursuit of a “near certain” truth.

What is the point of having a system of criminal justice if the system is more important than the justice?

I would hope this sort of crap would have the libertarians howling with outrage.

One year out

It’s been a year now since I showed up in Seattle for Clarion West. Despite the effect of the feelable unit reduction as you get older – how time slips away faster, with less to show for it – I think this last year might have been the fullest ever, though not, in the final analysis, the most enjoyable, since so many of the feelable units have involved feeling bad.

Still, I’ve been thinking about what the last year has meant; and what the legacy of Clarion has been. Probably the answer should be split in two. The writing-specific part is that I’m better now, by a lot, than I was a year ago. Monica and I were talking about this yesterday, and while the sources of improvement are many and varied, I would say the lion’s share of what skills I acquired in Seattle stem from a single comment, and everything that fell out of that comment:

Week 2, and we were critting my first story, The Mexican. I was nervous because it contained no speculative elements – it was fiction, not science fiction, not fantasy. I was also nervous because my stories tend to be pretty introspective and thoughtful, and reveal a lot of me, and you never know how a revelation like that will be received by almost-strangers. I suppose a resounding thud, then crickets chirping, were the sounds I expected to hear.

So when the overwhelmingly-positive response came I got hit with a dopamine reward-prediction-error rush the likes of which I’ve seldom experienced in life. It was an awesome feeling, and I use ‘awesome’ both in its literal and idiomatic sense. But what wasn’t awesome was Caren’s crit, which started out something like this:

C: Shane, you are a sneaky fucker. I was totally swept up in this, and read like twenty pages before I realized there were no scenes.

Scenes? What?

It fell out then that I didn’t, that I had never, either written or thought in scenes. My ’stories’ were mental journeys, ruminations, seat-of-the-pants explorations of whatever was obsessing me at the time. The scene – a reasonably self-contained episode where characters want things and do things and something is achieved in the end – was foreign to my repertoire, which is funny, since the scene is the most fundamental building block of any dramatic work. Writing scenes is pretty much the first thing you’d ever learn to do in writing, the bedrock upon which you’d build anything. So typical of me, to ignore two thousand years of accumulated wisdom, and set off in another direction.

Let me be explicit: this is not a compliment. This was not some roguish accomplishment on my part. Caren’s comment illuminated my profound failure to understand the craftsmanship of fiction and what makes it work. The comment explained, in part, why 90% of my stories got to be about ten thousand words long, become a tangled mass of spaghetti and solipsism, and were left for dead by the side of the road.

My next story, Numbers, was widely considered to have a couple of scenes. This pissed me off, since I’d explicitly written the fucking thing to include scenes galore. I got argumentative about that one, but of course Caren, Eden, and the other scene-nazis were right. My scene ninjitsu was still weak.

I kept trying. I got better at scenes. I got better at thinking in scenes. Little by little I developed the capacity to manipulate the larger structure of stories. This capacity is something I had always lacked – I could as soon plan the shape of a story as a trip to the moon, and with just as much success on the occasions when I _did_ make the attempt.

I hate golf, but I read once that when Tiger Woods was midway into his career he took a bunch of time off and re-engineered his swing from the ground up. I’m no Tiger Woods, obviously, but in terms of words written I’m well into my career. Thinking differently is hard; going back to the beginning is hard. But sometimes that’s what it takes.

For the last four days, until today, I’ve been writing a story every day. They’re short – under a thousand words apiece, which some people think is the wrong direction, since nobody reads short stories, really, and there’s little market for them. But for me it’s exactly the right direction. For me it’s getting the fundamentals in order, getting my head straight, so that when I graduate from baby steps for the second time I can go further, faster.

“I want to go further, faster.” That’s what I said in my Clarion application. Mission fucking accomplished, for once.

*

The other legacy of CW2008 has been to depress the fuck out of me. Granted, recent circumstances have offered ample opportunity for depression, but the CW-specific depression is the full awareness of how much better life can be than what it is.

I miss being surrounded by people who are, in the important ways, fundamentally like me. I didn’t realize how utterly I had lacked this kind of company; how lonely and isolated I had felt since practically forever. To go from three years of _nothing_ in LA to six weeks of full immersion with people who got the jokes, got the references, got the obsessions and the hunger –

and now it’s all gone again, gone for all of us, and we’re left with the task of trying to build something comparable, something just a little bit adequate in a Real World which doesn’t permit us to live together in a magical compound where we’re fed and carted to one party after another and surrounded by a community that respects us for who we are and for what we want to be. We were shown, graphically, what’s possible when conditions are perfect. But conditions will never again be perfect; and charting a course through those imperfections is the job that remains.

So one year out, and trying to put one foot in front of the other, trying to keep both feet pointed to somewhere worth going.

Socialism

I like good charts, so here’s one that displays the creeping socialism in the USA:

Picture 1

Be very afraid! Frickin commies!

(Got this from Conor Clarke’s blog post for The Atlantic.)

You have to love the internet

You just have to.

Elan will especially appreciate this.

(via kottke.)